Skip to main content

Company Intelligence

People+5 scopes · soon

Evidence becomes decisions, decisions become governed actions, and outcomes calibrate what Nodes learns next · 4 waiting on a human ruling · Illustrative — synthetic demo data

RecommendedMixed signals · refreshed today · owner Onboarding manager · approver Onboarding manager (self-approve allowed: low risk class)

Run focused ramp 1:1s for the off-curve new hires

Get off-curve hires back on the cohort ramp curve before the 90-day mark.

Cost of action
no cash cost · manager time
Value of action
11–17 days
Cost of waiting
2–4 days
Population
5 new hires across 4 departments
Nodes recommends · Focused ramp 1:1s now; pairing for the two hires with prior industry tenure.
Simulate
Waiting for evidenceNeeds more evidence · evidence gap identified 2 days ago · owner People business partner · approver People business partner

Open the retention play for the Claims cohort

Decide whether the Claims mixed-signal cohort warrants the same play as Underwriting.

Cost of action
$4K–$9K
Value of action
$972K–$1.7M
Cost of waiting
$243K–$432K
Population
54 people · Claims
Nodes recommends · Wait: the market-comp benchmark refresh lands in about a week and closes the gap.
Simulate
Ready for rulingPromising · refreshed 2h ago · owner People business partner · approver CHRO

Approve the retention play for the Underwriting cohort

A proportionate, human-owned intervention before the historical departure window closes.

Cost of action
$9K–$18K
Value of action
$1.5M–$2.7M
Cost of waiting
$756K–$1.3M
Population
84 people · Underwriting
Nodes recommends · Confidential review + targeted 1:1s now; comp moves only where the benchmark confirms.
Simulate
Waiting for approvalStrong evidence · refreshed 2h ago · owner Talent development lead · approver Department head (sign-off pending)

Internal fill: development step for the ready-to-move cohort

Fill adjacent-role gaps from within, keeping the strongest retention lever in play.

Cost of action
no cash cost · development time
Value of action
$168K–$312K
Cost of waiting
1–2 likely external offers per quarter
Population
6 people across 5 departments
Nodes recommends · Approve for the sustained-signal candidates; hold borderline cases for the manager's read.
Simulate
ApprovedStrong evidence · approved yesterday · owner Hiring lead · approver Hiring lead (recorded)

Re-run sourcing for the Senior Underwriter req on persona v6

Repeat the Q2 outcome: a top-performer share above the legacy sequence.

Cost of action
$3K–$6K
Value of action
$120K–$240K
Cost of waiting
$8K–$15K
Population
1 open req · 32 matched candidates
Nodes recommends · Re-run on v6 with the multi-touch sequence as drafted.
Simulate
Being executedMixed signals · executing · day 6 · owner Hiring operations · approver Hiring operations (recorded)

Compressed interview-loop pilot for Technology roles

Test whether shorter loops hold quality bands, per the disproven loop-length belief.

Cost of action
no cash cost · scheduling time
Value of action
9–14 days
Cost of waiting
1–2 days
Population
2 role families · next 20 candidates
Nodes recommends · Pilot the compressed loop on two role families, measure at the next cohort mark.
Simulate
Waiting for an outcomePromising · day 21 of the window · owner People business partner · approver CHRO (recorded)

Retention play for the Platform pod (cohort)

Contain the attrition pattern in the Platform pod with a proportionate play.

Cost of action
$6K–$11K
Value of action
$25K–$40K
Cost of waiting
$500–$900
Population
1–3 people · Platform pod
Nodes recommends · Executing as approved; no further action until the window closes.
SimulateConfirm action
Waiting for an outcomePromising · day 34 of the window · owner People business partner · approver CHRO (recorded)

Manager-variance review for the two out-of-band managers

Surface coachable practices from the retention gap between two same-role-family managers.

Cost of action
no cash cost · conversation time
Value of action
$420K–$680K
Cost of waiting
$60K–$95K
Population
2 managers · 14 direct reports
Nodes recommends · Shared; the follow-up conversation lands after the next retention mark.
Simulate
CompletedStrong evidence · outcome observed · calibration recorded · owner Hiring operations · approver CHRO (recorded)

Retire the inverse-keyword screening rule

Stop filtering qualified pipeline on a rule with no predictive signal.

Cost of action
no cash cost · rule change
Value of action
$1.8M–$2.4M
Cost of waiting
$600K–$900K
Population
Company-wide screening
Nodes recommends · Retired company-wide, with the rule preserved in the trace for audit.
Simulate
CompletedStrong evidence · outcome observed · calibration recorded · owner Onboarding manager · approver CHRO (recorded)

Ramp pairing program for the spring cohort

Test pairing against buddy-only onboarding for new hires.

Cost of action
$8K–$14K
Value of action
11–17 days
Cost of waiting
2–4 days
Population
34 new hires · spring cohort
Nodes recommends · Pairing for role families with available top-decile bandwidth.
Simulate
DeferredNeeds more evidence · deferred 12 days ago · owner Talent development lead · approver CHRO

Actuarial succession bench build-out

Prepare internal candidates for the two actuarial leadership seats that turn over in 2–3 years.

Cost of action
$40K–$80K
Value of action
$150K–$300K
Cost of waiting
none until the trigger date nears
Population
2 leadership seats · Actuarial
Nodes recommends · Defer to Q4; the readiness signal stays live and re-surfaces on any trigger change.
Simulate
Stale · regenerateNeeds more evidence · stale · watermark aged 11 of 7 permitted days · owner Hiring lead · approver Hiring lead

Sales agent req sourcing rerun

Repeat the sourcing-rerun lift on the Sales agent req family.

Cost of action
$3K–$6K
Value of action
$90K–$180K
Cost of waiting
$6K–$12K
Population
1 req family · Sales
Nodes recommends · Regenerate: the ATS watermark is 11 days old and the rule requires 7.
Simulate
Reopened recurrencePromising · reopened 3 days ago · owner People business partner · approver CHRO

Customer Support retention play (recurred)

The pattern resolved in the spring, then recurred on a new population; this is a new episode.

Cost of action
$4K–$8K
Value of action
$60K–$120K
Cost of waiting
$9K–$16K
Population
54 people · Customer Support
Nodes recommends · Reopen as a recurrence: template the prior play, re-verify the evidence on this population.
Simulate
RecommendedPromising · last override yesterday · owner Hiring operations · approver Hiring operations

Refresh the screening rule the manager keeps overriding

Three consecutive overrides of the same recommendation means the rule is the outlier.

Cost of action
no cash cost · review time
Value of action
1–2 days
Cost of waiting
1–3 days
Population
1 screening rule · all Sales reqs
Nodes recommends · Open the rule review; the override log is already assembled in the trace.
Simulate